Unlike keyword search, AI search focuses on understanding your intent - so the clearer and more specific your query is, the better the results will be. Make a precise query for the legal principle you are trying to prove. Below are given some examples on how to create good queries.
To make your search results more focussed you can use Act Filter or enter specify keywords in Keyword Filter.
Please Use keyword filter only when you necessarily want some particular keywords to appear in the judgment.
Do not add Act Names in the search query, instead use the given Act Filter Section to narrow down your results.
Avoid entering questions in the search query instead use assertions to get better results. For example -
Instead of: "can arbitrator decide dispute of fraud?" Search: "arbitrator cannot decide dispute of fraud"
Instead of: "can defendant file counter claim against co-defendant?" Search: "defendant cannot file counter claim against co-defendant
Instead of: "whether civil court has right to decide over rent matter?" Search: Since we know the act name here we can add Rajasthan Rent Control Act in the Act Filter and then search "civil court retains jurisdiction over rent suit if the matter was filed before Act was applicable"
Good Search: if MSME loan defaulter provides a proposal to the bank they are obligated to consider it based on RBI guidelines
If you're not getting the expected results, add all relevant contextual information to your query to disambiguate the search. For example -
Too Vague: "role of a private counsel in criminal matters is limited" Better Search: "role of a private counsel in criminal matters is limited under direction of public prosecutor"
General: "MSME loan defaulter proposal" Better Search: "if MSME loan defaulter provides a proposal to the bank they are obligated to consider it based on RBI guidelines"
Please read at least top 10 highlighted headnote search results.